My first encounter with ACIM was in 1990. My husband and I had been assigned pre-marital counseling by the Catholic Church we attended. The counselor felt that ACIM would be right up my alley, she so encouraged me to get a copy of the text, which I did. I started to read it but found it way too confusing so immediately gave up until a few years later.
In 1992, I was in a Dallas bookstore buying a copy of Anthony de Mello’s Awareness for a friend. As I was checking out, a woman came in asking for the exact book I had just purchased. I was able to tell her there was one more copy left and I showed her where to find it. It was an unusual book to buy, and mentioning the synchronicity of our meeting, she asked me if I knew anything about ACIM. I told her I had the book but I didn’t really know anything about it. She gave me her card and told me there was a nearby ACIM group that met every week – call her.
I didn’t call her until two years later, in 1994 after I had read Marianne Williamson’s A Return to Love. Unfortunately, the woman no longer attended the meeting, but she gave me the details and I ended up attending almost every week for the next year. The group would read through the text together and if anyone had a thought, they’d voice it to the group and we would discuss it. We got through a good portion of the mid to end part of the text, but that was the extent of my study.
In 1995, we moved to California. There was a group that met in Fullerton through the Miracle Distribution Center, but I didn’t particularly care for it. The philosophy was a little too new-age for my tastes. I tried another group but didn’t particularly like it either, so quit studying it altogether. I did attend the conventions that were held in Anaheim by the Miracle Distribution Center, however. I went to all of those while I was living in California and got to hear great speakers like Hugh Prather, Marianne Williamson, Jerry Jampolsky, Diane Cirincione, Lee Jampolsky, Judith Skutch, Patrick Miller, Frances Vaughn, Roger Walsh, and many other long-time students of ACIM. I found their ideas fascinating, but never fascinating enough to actually pick up the book and study it on my own.
After we moved back to Texas, I didn’t think about it at all for almost 5 years, until I went to a Spiritual Counselor who was s longtime student and teacher of ACIM. She encouraged me to read various sections, which I did, but I didn’t actually start working my way through the lessons until a few years ago, after I heard a talk by Kenneth Wapnick comparing Nietzsche’s three stages (camel, lion child) in Thus Spoke Zarathustra with ACIM. I had made a serious study of the Existentialists and had found Nietzsche particularly enthralling. His stages seemed to me to be the stuff of mystics. I was thrilled to find out that these same stages show up in ACIM. I didn’t entirely agree with Wapnick’s understanding of Nietzsche’s “child” stage, however. It seemed to me that what Wapnick was saying there is some sort of final destination and I don’t see it that way at all. I think Nietzsche’s stages represent a never ending journey of becoming. There IS no final destination. It’s a constant journey of becoming.
Anyway, that comparison finally gave me the encouragement to work through the lessons. I got all the way through Lesson 270 and beyond, and then got distracted by raising teens, I suppose.
I was mentioning to my husband what Helen Schucman (the scribe of ACIM) had said to Willis (Bill) Harman: “I know it’s true, but I don’t believe it.” That’s been my same struggle for 20 years. I can feel the truth of it, I just don’t always believe it. What I do know is that I was able to deal with what went on in my life much better when I was making my way through the Lessons than I have been lately. My husband said he’d like to work through the lessons with me.
Starting July 10, 2010, we are beginning with Lesson 1.
Join us!